Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2009No. CC 16-03-23044; CA A124001; SC S056410PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in Lane County Circuit Court in 2003, challenging the Governor’s authority to enter into a gaming compact with the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Suislaw Indians (the Tribes). Under the compact, the Tribes would be permitted to open a casino near Florence, Oregon. On the state’s motion, the trial court dismissed relators’ petition on two grounds: (1) relators had failed to show that they had no adequate remedy at law; and (2) relators had failed to join the Tribes in the action, in violation of ORCP 29 A. Relators appealed, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Buell v. Jefferson County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. FeltonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Hicks v. Central Point School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Marteeny v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API