STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. Kulongoski
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
Relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in Lane County Circuit Court in 2003, challenging the Governor’s authority to enter into a gaming compact with the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Suislaw Indians (the Tribes). Under the compact, the Tribes would be permitted to open a casino near Florence, Oregon. On the state’s motion, the trial court dismissed relators’ petition on two grounds: (1) relators had failed to show that they had no adequate remedy at law; and (2) relators had failed to join the Tribes in the action, in violation of ORCP 29 A. Relators appealed, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Buell v. Jefferson County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. FeltonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Hicks v. Central Point School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Marteeny v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.