Legal Opinion
Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 17, 2011No. 2007-5115PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. Opinion concurring-in-part and concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants (“plaintiffs”) are fourteen water, drainage, and irrigation districts and thirteen agricultural landowners in Oregon and California.1 Plaintiffs appeal the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims that, based on two separate summary judgment decisions, dismissed their Fifth Amendment takings claims, their claims under the Klamath River Basin Compact, Pub.L. No. 85-222, 71 Stat. 497 (1957)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Pelagic Fishing Company, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- The Estate of Wayne Hage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Century Exploration New Orleans, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.