Legal Opinion
Garshman v. Universal Resources Holding, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 3, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-2369 (SSB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs David Garshman and Donald Frank, general partners for Tarbell I (“Tarbell”), a Pennsylvania limited partnership which invests in oil and gas exploration, bring this proposed class action alleging antitrust violations and breach of contract against several companies which finance their drilling operations with investors’ funds and against the pipeline company which services those wells and purchases most of the fuel produced. Defendant Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (“Columbia”) now moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cayman Exploration Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- McM Partners, Incorporated v. Andrews-Bartlett & Associates, Incorporated, Doing Business as Andrews-Bartlett Exposition ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Garshman v. Universal Resources Holding, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- North Jersey Secretarial School, Inc. v. McKiernanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Garshman v. Universal Resources Holding Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.