Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hayden v. Horton

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1903No. 12,920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Charles T. Dickinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

On the 15th day of July, 1899, a writ of mandamus was issued by the district court for Douglas county against the Greater America Exposition and certain officers and agents of that corporation, on the application of Hayden Brothers, commanding the Greater America Exposition to “cause to be issued and delivered to William Hayden, Edward Hayden and Joseph Hayden, partners doing business in the name of Hayden Brothers, forthwith, an unconditional order upon the treasurer, Frank Murphy, for the payment to them of the sum of ten thousand dollars, and that you, W. S. Streetor, auditor, do forthwith…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gould v. McFallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Horton v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Johnson v. RuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Healy v. WostenbergWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Maslankowski v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API