Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Ruhl
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1956No. 33905PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
A general demurrer of appellees to the petition of appellants was sustained. They elected not to plead further. A judgment of dismissal of the case was rendered by the district court. This appeal is from that judgment.
A general demurrer tests the substantive legal rights of the parties upon admitted facts including proper and reasonable inferences of law and fact which may be drawn from the facts which are pleaded. Central Neb. Public Power & Irr. Dist. v. Walston, 140 Neb. 190, 299 N. W. 609; Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. Sumner, 159 Neb. 57, 65 N. W. 2d 240.
The following is the substance of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gould v. McFallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. SumnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District v. WalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Rhoads v. Columbia Fire Underwriters AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dixon v. Reconciliation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Clark & Enersen, Hamersky, Schlaebitz, Burroughs & Thomsen, Inc. v. Schimmel Hotels Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Schuyler State Bank v. CechNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Utsumi v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Dangberg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.