Legal Opinion

Healy v. Wostenberg

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1934No. 1824PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

In this case, a judgment of the District Court of Washakie County directing the issuance of a writ of restitution of the possession of certain real property located in said county is brought here by direct appeal. The judgment was entered on the application of Effie Isadora Wostenberg, as administratrix of the estate of Henry August Wostenberg, deceased, subsequently generally referred to herein as the “petitioner” or as the “administratrix,” and ran against the appellant Alex Healy and “any and all persons holding and in possession under him.” Healy may conveniently be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goltra v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Northwestern Fuel Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Higgins v. McCreaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. McJilton v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Ure v. UreIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Redwood Hotel, Inc. v. KorbienCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. Grose v. SauvageauWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Arndt v. Sheridan Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hursh v. WelieverWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Van Patten v. Van PattenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API