Legal Opinion

Woodcraft Construction, Inc. v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 1990No. 9769-2-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.

Woodcraft Construction, Inc., obtained a default judgment in Alaska against Paul S. Hamilton, Leonard Hamilton, and Kenneth R. Bogner. After executing upon property in Alaska, a deficiency remained. Woodcraft then filed the Alaska judgment in Spokane County Superior Court pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, RCW 6.36.

Woodcraft sought to collect that deficiency from the Hamilton community property and Mrs. Ruth Hamilton, wife of Leonard Hamilton and mother of Paul S. Hamilton. Mrs. Hamilton challenged Woodcraft's right on the basis that this was not a community debt,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crane Towing, Inc. v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Clark v. HORSE RACING COMMISSIONWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Day v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Oil Heat Co. of Port Angeles, Inc. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Marriage of GreenleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Huntington National Bank v. SproulNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Boeing Employees' Credit Union v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Noordin v. AbdullaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Allison v. John M. Biggs, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API