Legal Opinion

Tebbets v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1909No. Sac. No. 1521PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought to recover insurance, upon the death of F. F. Tebbets, under the terms of an accident life-insurance policy. Insured died September 4, 1904. Action was not commenced until April 5, 1905. The policy provided that affirmative proof of the death of the insured must be furnished the company within two months after its occurrence and that “legal proceedings for recovery hereunder may not be brought before the expiry of three months from the date of filing proofs at the company’s home office, nor brought at all unless begun within six months from time of death.” A general…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Union Central Life Ins. v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Moreno v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API