Legal Opinion

Mertz v. Detroit Electric Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Jacob G. Mertz and John H. Heppner, copartners as Mertz & Heppner, against the Detroit Electric Railway, for damages caused by a collision with a trolley car. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

Plaintiff Heppner, who is in the coal and wood business, started at nightfall on the 4th of March, 1899, to deliver a load of coal from his place of business to a customer named Baudie, who lived at the corner of Oakland avenue and Belmont street, Detroit. He drove out Woodward avenue to Westminster avenue, thence east on Westminster avenue to Oakland avenue, and thence north on Oakland avenue to go to Mr. Baudie’s house, which was about five or six blocks north of Westminster. Defendant’s cars are operated on Oakland avenue upon a double track. The street is unpaved, and at this season of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Mahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rascher v. East Detroit & Grosse Pointe Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. La Pontney v. Shedden Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lyons v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ablard v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Baldie v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Golob v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API