Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1895No. 15944PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought by the widow and six children of Florence Mahoney, deceased, to recover damages for his death, which they allege was caused by the negligence of the defendant.

A verdict of ten thousand dollars was rendered, and this appeal is taken by the defendant from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

The defendant was engaged in operating a street railway on which cars were propelled by electricity, by the overhead or trolley system. The accident occurred on the old mission road—a public highway—within the city and county of San Francisco, at about 10 o’clock, upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shea v. Potrero & Bay View RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API