Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Antrim; Mayne, J. Case by David A. Line against the Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury. The plaintiff was injured through being struck by a train on the morning of January 11, 1899, at a highway crossing in the village of Alba, Mich. The plaintiff recovered a substantial judgment. The defendant afterwards made a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. This motion was denied. The case is brought here by writ of error.
It is strenuously insisted the lower court was clearly in error in refusing to grant the motion for a new trial under the statute — counsel citing Baldwin v.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Richardson v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Dupuis v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Little v. Bousfield & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Millette v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.