Legal Opinion

La Pontney v. Shedden Cartage Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Case by Joseph LaPontney against the Shedden Cartage Company, Limited, for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought an action for negligent injury, and recovered a verdict and judgment. Defendant brings error.

The testimony offered at the trial tended to show that the plaintiff was at the time of the injury a motorman on one of the cars of the Citizens’ Street Railway. Defendant company is engaged in the business of trucking. On *515the 6th of September, 1895, at 4:05 a. m., defendant’s employes were engaged in trucking a “merry-go-round” from one part of the city to another. This “merry-go-round ” was 8 to 12 feet high, about 40 feet across, and covered with canvas. The defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Winters v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Tunison v. WeadockMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Robinson v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Ablard v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mertz v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API