Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Martin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; Rockwell, J. Bill by John Hammer and another against Armittie Martin to set aside an exchange of real property on the ground of fraud. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Kuhn, J,

The bill of complaint in this case seeks to set aside, on the ground of fraudulent misrepresentations, a certain real estate transaction wherein the plaintiffs purchased from the defendant, on land contract, an 80-acre farm in the township of Commerce, Oakland county, and turned in as the initial payment thereon their equity in a certain lot in the city of Detroit, assigning the land contract for the latter to the defendant. The allegations as to fraud are as follows:

_ “2. The preliminary negotiations between the parties which culminated in the execution of said contract, were had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bristol v. BraidwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Walker v. CasgrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Collins v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. A & M Land Development Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Albright v. StockhillMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bowen v. StocklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. O'Neill v. KunkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bayley v. FriedbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API