O'Neill v. Kunkle
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiffs as vendees in a land contract owned a parcel of land in Detroit. Defendants were owners in fee of a piece of land at Lake Orion. They agreed to exchange. Plaintiffs transferred to defendants the interest in the Detroit property and re ceived back a land contract for the Lake Orion property at the price of $8,500, of which $3,500 was paid down by the transfer of the Detroit property. The bill is' for rescission on the ground of fraud. Plaintiffs had decree. Defendants have appealed.
The facts found by the court in favor of plaintiffs, which finding is well supported by the record,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Jandorf v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Hammer v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pound v. ClumMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Mettetal v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Barke v. Grand Mobile Homes Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Poloms v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.