Legal Opinion

Kost v. Bender

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1872PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Error to Lenawee Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The declaration in this case is upon a promissoi’y note which was given to the plaintiff by the defendant as part payment on a purchase of lands supposed to be valuable for the production- of mineral oil. The defense is, that the defendant was defrauded in the sale, and has sustained damages in consequence, which he is entitled recoup.

The note is negotiable, and was transferred by the plaintiff} before it fell due, to a' party, who, he claims, was a dona fide purchaser, without notice of any infirmity, and who afterwards, for a new consideration, sold it back to him. And the plaintiff further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Culley v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Murray v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API