Bowen v. Stocklin
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ottawa; Cross (Orlen S.), J. Bill by William T. Bowen and another against Emil Stocklin and another to rescind an exchange of real estate on the ground of fraud. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.
Plaintiffs are husband and wife, as áre also defendants. Plaintiffs’ bill was filed May 29, 1920, to rescind an exchange of real estate between the parties made January 30, 1918. The alleged ground of rescission is false and fraudulent representations made by defendants as to the amount of fertile and tillable land contained in a 40-acre farm located in Robinson township, Ottawa county, which they traded to plaintiffs for a house and lots in the city of Grand Haven. Plaintiffs had decree in the trial court and defendants have appealed, claiming as ground for reversal that upon the record made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Draft v. HesselsweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Hammer v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Lewless v. Detroit, Grand Hayen & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- Case v. GorenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Latimer v. PiperMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Bayley v. FriedbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Boss v. TomarasMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Dorgan v. BirneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.