Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cockrell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COUCH, Judge.
Acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV 9, Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Paul J. Cockrell, a member of the Bar of this Court. The petition asserted that Cockrell violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A), (1), (4), (5), (6); 1 Disciplinary Rule 6-101 (A) (3); 2 Disciplinary Rule 7-101 (A), (1), (2), (3) 3 in his repre sentation of Mozella Ziglar. The petition also asserted that Cockrell, in his representations of Alice Tanner, violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102 (A) (1), (5), (6);…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.