Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 31, 1979No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 9, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission through Bar Counsel filed a petition for disciplinary action against Marshall I. Stewart (Stewart) alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Pursuant to Maryland Rule BY9, we referred the matter to the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City to be heard by a three-judge panel. The panel, after giving notice and conducting an evidentiary hearing, made findings of fact from which it concluded that Stewart had violated certain disciplinary rules as charged. It recommended that he be disbarred. In a memorandum opinion, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API