Legal Opinion
Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District v. Wutchumna Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1931No. Docket No. 113PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District filed an action in the Superior Court of Tulare County against the Wutchumna Water Company and James B. Rivers, seeking a writ of mandate to compel the delivery of certain water to which the irrigation district claimed to be entitled as a stockholder in the water company. The water company diverts a considerable portion of the water of the Kaweah River into what is known as the Wutchumna ditch, which runs in a general- westerly direction. A short distance below the point of that diversion the. Kaweah River divides into two channels, the northerly one…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Faus v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bechtel v. AxelrodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bernheimer v. BernheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- City of San Diego v. Otay Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.