Legal Opinion
MGA Insurance v. Fisher-Roundtree
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1998No. 97-6391, 97-6414PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff MGA Insurance Company brought this diversity action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 seeking a judgment declaring that the insurance policy it issued to defendants Carlton and Martha Wiggins did not cover the injuries suffered by defendant Kathleen Fisher-Roundtree allegedly caused by the Wiggins’ negligence. The district court granted summary judgment in MGA’s favor, and defendants appeal. Reviewing the district court’s grant of summary judgment and its interpretation of the insurance policy de novo, see Wolf v. Prudential Ins. Co., 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir.1995); Houston Gen. Ins. Co. v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- United States v. Troy Clayton KleinebreilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Shepard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Houston General Insurance Company v. American Fence Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mga Insurance Company Inc. v. Kathleen Estelle Fisher-Roundtree, and Carlton A. Wiggins Martha Wiggins, Individually and D/B/A Noble Propane Company, Mga Insurance Company Inc. v. Carlton A. Wiggins Martha Wiggins, Individually and D/B/A Noble Propane Company, and Kathleen Estelle Fisher-RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Stangl v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2011