Legal Opinion
Houston General Insurance Company v. American Fence Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1997No. 96-6197PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant American Fence Company, Inc. appeals from a summary judgment granting declaratory relief for plaintiff Houston General Insurance Company. 1 The only issue presented is whether the district court was correct in concluding that a personal vehicle being driven by an American Fence employee did not constitute a “covered ‘auto’ ” under the temporary substitute auto provision of an insurance policy issued to American Fence by Houston General. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The facts are undisputed. On December 19,1991, Jim Woodie, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teddy Ray DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Utilities Ins. Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Federal Insurance Company, & v. Tri-State Insurance Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. C.R. Gurule, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Boggs v. Great Northern InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.