Legal Opinion

Lee-Moore Oil Co. v. Cleary

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1978No. 63PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This is a civil action for damages for conversion. Plaintiff claims that it is the owner of certain gasoline dispensing equipment — two gasoline pumps, one 3000-gallon gasoline storage tank, one 1000-gallon gasoline storage tank, and a one-half horsepower air compressor — located on defendants’ real property consisting essentially of a grocery store and service station known as “Marley’s Store.” Defendants claim these items are fixtures, title to which passed to them when they purchased the realty on which the items are located. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Western North Carolina Railroad v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Workman v. HenrieUtah Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Little v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Bohle v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. All Points Capital Corp. v. Laurel Hill Paper Co. (In Re Laurel Hill Paper Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. Griffiths v. Office of the State Fire MarshalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API