Legal Opinion

Springs v. . Refining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to restrain the defendant from removing "any buildings, structures, equipment and appliances placed or installed upon the premises of the plaintiffs at the northeast corner of West Trade and Pine streets in the city of Charlotte prior to the first day of July, 1932."

The facts alleged are these:

1. On 17 June, 1929, the plaintiffs leased the premises in question to John F. Boyd and C. E. B. Mendenhall as a filling-station site for a period of three years beginning 1 July, 1929, and ending 30 June, 1932. Said lease which is in writing and duly registered contains the following…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Belvin v. Raleigh Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Abbott and Foster v. . CromartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Tise v. . Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Western North Carolina Railroad v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Hamlet Hospital v. Joint Committee on StandardizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Lee-Moore Oil Co. v. ClearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Ilderton Oil Company v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API