Legal Opinion
Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. McCarthy
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 27, 1943PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
The New York City Municipal Court Code (L. 1915, ch. 279, as amd.) provides, so far as material here, that a summons, in a case where the Municipal Court of the City of New York has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, may be served upon the defendant within the city of New York in like manner as though the summons issued out of the Supreme Court, provided, that it shall not be served by publication (§ 21) and that the summons, or the summons and complaint, if the complaint is served with the summons, must be filed with proof of service in the office of the clerk in the district…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by36 opinions
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Miller v. Surf Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Chaplin v. SelznickNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Potter's Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.