Legal Opinion

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1922No. 146PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The respondent Produce Company recovered a judgment against petitioner, the delivering carrier, .for damages to two carloads of apples transported during November, 1914, upon through bills of lading oyer connecting lines from points in New York State to one in Nebraska. The evidence tended to show that the apples were in good condition when received, by the initial carrier, but .were frozen when delivered at destination. Where the damage occurred was not shown.

Petitioner moved for a directed verdict claiming no recovery could be had against it without affirmative evidence that it caused the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Varnville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Laughlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. NaiveTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. R. H. Fulton v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Weisman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Madow Co. v. S.S. Liberty ExporterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API