Legal Opinion
Chaplin v. Selznick
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1944PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
This is a stockholders’ derivative action brought on behalf of United Artists Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “ United ”) against David 0. Selznick Productions, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “ Productions ”), Vanguard Filins, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “ Vanguard ”), David 0. Selznick, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “ Twentieth Century ”) and United Artists Corporation.
As to the defendant corporations, the complaint alleges that United is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in the city and State of New York, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gaboury v. Central Vermont Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Potter's Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.