Legal Opinion

Webb & Aigner v. Darrow

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 5, 1933No. 8 Div. 442PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This cause involves the landlord’s lien on crops of subtenants, or the proceeds of such crops, in the possession of third persons.

Appellee, the landlord, sued by bill in equity.

Demurrers challenging the bill as amended on the ground of adequate remedy at law were not well taken.

The landlord’s lien exists apart from the statutory remedy by attachment, and may be enforced by bill in equity. Westmoreland & Trousdale v. Foster, 60 Ala. 448; Price v. Pickett, 21 Ala. 741; Patton v. Darden, ante, p. 129, 148 So. 806.

The lien follows the proceeds of crops so long as they may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westmoreland & Trousdale v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Price v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Ehrman v. OatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Albertville Trading Co. v. CritcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. SklarMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WerfelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API