Legal Opinion

American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Werfel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 23, 1935No. 3 Div. 123PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill was filed under sections 8376, 8377, of the Code to have applied to the satisfaction of a judgment for complainant against the individual respondent th,e insurance money provided for in the contract with the respondent casualty company.

The demurrers were, overruled; hence this appeal. The questions presented by the ruling and several grounds of demurrer will be grouped and so considered.

The bill is illustrated by a copy of the insurance policy, referred to and made a part thereof. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90.

It is insisted that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. National Surety Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Alabama Chemical Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Continental Auto Ins. Underwriters v. MenuskinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bonnie A. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API