Legal Opinion

Albertville Trading Co. v. Critcher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 7, 1927No. 8 Div. 944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is by a mortgagee of certain bales of cotton against a purchaser from the mortgagor. The case went to the jury on the counts in the case for the destruction of the mortgage lien, and in assumpsit for money had and received.

The main issue of fact in the ease was whether the mortgagee gave his consent to the sale. This issue, under the evidence, was for the jury. The testimony of the plaintiff that he agreed or promised the fertilizer man to see his bill paid was admissible in connection with his evidence that he agreed for the mortgagor to sell the first picking to pay that bill, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinckard v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Windham & Co. v. Stephenson & AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Ehrman v. OatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. City of AttallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Webb & Aigner v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. American Standard Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Assets Realization Co. v. GanusAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API