Sloan v. Wells
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
The sole question presented is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on defendant’s counterclaim.
In finding no error in the trial below, the Court of Appeals apparently relied on an Oregon case, Rodgers Insurance Agency v. Andersen Machinery, 211 Or. 459, 316 P. 2d 497 (1957), and quoted the following language therefrom:. . . [W]e believe that a contract to procure insurance should be proved with the same certainty as an oral contract of insurance or agreement to insure. The essential elements of such an agreement were first stated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Hamacher v. TUMYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Moore v. Adams Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Rodgers Insurance Agency v. Andersen MacHineryOregon Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hursh Agency, Inc. v. Wigwam Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- R-Anell Homes, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Barnard v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Alford v. TUDOR HALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Harrell v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.