Barnard v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Defendant and third-party plaintiff Bobby Rowland (Rowland) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 50(b) (1990) for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). Rowland also contends the court erred by: (1) granting the directed verdict motion of plaintiffs Everette and Diane Barnard (the Barnards) on Rowland’s claim of tor-tious interference of contract; and (2) failing to instruct the jury properly on the doctrines of impossibility of performance and prevention, and contribution. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Peoples Security Life Insurance v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Bloch v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- McCullough v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Word v. Jones Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Adams v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.