Legal Opinion

Alford v. TUDOR HALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1985No. 8430SC1117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The sole question presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Judgment notwithstanding the verdict was properly granted if all the evidence supporting plaintiffs’ claim, taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, was not sufficient as a matter of law to support a verdict for the plaintiffs. Hargett v. Air Service and Lewis v. Air Service, 23 N.C. App. 636, 638, 209 S.E. 2d 518, 519 (1974), cert. denied 286 N.C. 414, 211 S.E. 2d 217 (1975); Musgrave v. Savings & Loan Assoc., 8…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. McCall v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Boney, Insurance Comr. v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. May v. United Services Ass'n of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harris v. AlbrechtUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Barnett v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Baldwin v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Baggett v. Summerlin Insurance & Realty Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API