Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 11, 1978No. 24482, CA 9795PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to an information charging him with the crime of supplying contraband, ORS 162.185, and the state appeals. The issue is whether the definition of contraband in ORS 162.135 is unconstitutionally vague. We hold that the statute is valid.
ORS 162.185(1) provides:
"A person commits the crime of supplying contraband if:
"(a) He knowingly introduces any contraband into a correctional facility, juvenile training school or state hospital; or
"(b) Being confined in a correctional facility, juvenile training school or state hospital he knowingly makes, obtains…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. SamterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. PopielOregon Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. MellingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. CorpuzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- City of Portland v. AzizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.