Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Aziz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 18, 1980No. DA 177184-7908, CA 16522PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*939ROBERTS, J.
The defendant was charged with a violation of Portland City Ordinance No. 139931, § 14.24.160, infra, which prohibits the unlawful operation of a device designed for sound production. He demurred to the city’s complaint, contending inter alia that the ordinance is vague and overbroad. The trial court first overruled the demurrer, but on the defendant’s motion to reconsider the court sustained the demurrer. The city appeals from the subsequent order dismissing its complaint. ORS 46.810; 138.060(1). We reverse.
The defendant’s demurrer had several bases. In addition to the claim that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. EwingHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
- City of Portland v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. MaganaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Sharkey's, Inc. v. City of WaukeshaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.