State v. Samter
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore.)
Each defendant was charged with two separate violations of OBS 163.650 whieh provides:
“Any person, not being a parent of the child, who knowingly and wilfully cruelly mistreats and maltreats a child under the age of 16 years, shall be punished * * (Emphasis ours.)
Each indictment contained three identical counts of cruel mistreatment and maltreatment. They were:
Bequiring a child to stand naked at night in near freezing temperatures while being sprayed with water from a garden hose;
Beating him with a wooden paddle while naked;
Bequiring him to smoke and swallow tobacco…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Coon v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State v. KilloryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. AlboSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- City of Portland v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.