Legal Opinion
Bindschusz v. Phillips
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 2001No. 637 EDA 2000PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 This appeal has been taken from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury1 in favor of appellee, Robbie Bindschusz, following the denial of the post-trial motions of appellants by the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. Appellants contend that they are entitled to a new trial as a result of certain evidentiary rulings made by the trial court. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the judgment entered upon the verdict.
¶ 2 The basic facts of the case are not in dispute. Appellee, Robbie Bindschusz, injured his knee when he jumped from a tow truck while at work * President Judge…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Betty U. Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Wexler v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.