Legal Opinion

Greever v. Persky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1941No. 14295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit seeks a recovery for the alleged payment of usurious interest. The suit is brought by Goldie Persky, as guardian of I. B. Persky, a person of unsound mind.

In 1936, I. B. Persky was a dealer in oil field equipment. Defendant Greever was in the insurance business. Both lived in Wichita Falls and had known each other for a long time. Greever, the only witness testifying in the case, testified in substance as follows:

Persky approached Greever in the latter part of 1936, stating that he was doing a large volume of business, that he had exhausted his credit at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmetto Lumber Co. v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McDaniel v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Deming Inv. Co. v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Trinity Fire Insurance v. Kerrville Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bearden v. Texas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greever v. PerskyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Furr v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Persky v. GreeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Griffith v. GadberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Leteff v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API