Legal Opinion

Greever v. Persky

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1942No. 7943PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

This is a. usury case. There is no dispute in the testimony of most of the material points in the case. The facts, as testified to by the defendant, B. B. Greever, are substantially as follows: In the year 1936 I. B. Persky was in financial difficul*66ties and needed money. He contacted Greever, who was not in the loan business, and offered to pay him a commission of three per cent per month for a period of ninety days if Greever would use his credit and procure for him a loan of $15,000.00. Greever, who did not have the money himself, but did have the collateral with which to borrow the same,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Palmetto Lumber Co. v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wood v. Continental Sav. & Bldg. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Perry v. Stewart Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. First Bank v. Tony's Tortilla Factory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API