Legal Opinion

In re Michael D.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 6, 2000No. AC 19606PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), appeals from the judgments rendered following the trial court’s granting of the minor children’s motions to strike the neglect petitions filed by the commissioner against the respondent parents. The commissioner claims that the court improperly granted the motions to strike the neglect petitions. We reverse the judgments of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the appeal. This case involves the respondent parents and their minor children,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Bell v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. In re Kelly S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Knight v. F. L. Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Hogan v. Department of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. In Re TKConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. In re T.K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API