Legal Opinion
Knight v. F. L. Roberts & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1997No. SC 15438PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The plaintiff, William Knight, who conducts business as Knight’s Service Station, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court striking his claims against the defendants, F. L. Roberts and Company, Inc., B. P. Exploration and Oil, Inc., and Dairy Mart, Inc., for reimbursement of alleged remediation costs under General Statutes § 22a-452 (a).2 We conclude that *468the trial court improperly granted the defendants’ motions to strike and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
In his revised complaint, the plaintiff alleged the following relevant facts.3 Prior to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bell v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.