Legal Opinion

In Re TK

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 29, 2008No. 28458PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

939 A.2d 9 (2008)

105 Conn.App. 502

In re T.K.[*]

No. 28458.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued November 27, 2007.

Decided January 29, 2008.

Penn Rhodeen, New Haven, for the appellants (respondents).

Jon Femia, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman and Jessica Gauvin, assistant attorneys general, for the appellee (petitioner).

GRUENDEL, LAVINE and FOTI, J.

LAVINE, J.

"Parents have a constitutionally protected right to raise and care for their own children. . . . This right is not free from intervention by the state,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. In re Jeffrey C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Misthopoulos v. MisthopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Hogan v. Department of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Cass County Social Service Center v. N.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API