Legal Opinion
Jackson v. City of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1957No. Civ. 16985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AGEE, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying their application to set aside and have declared void a variance granted by a city council as to certain land zoned as residential. The sole issue is whether the city council acted upon substantial evidence in granting the variance.
The real property involved is a 7-acre parcel located on the west side of El Camino Real (State Highway Route 101) at the intersection thereof with Fifth Avenue, in the city of San Mateo. The portion immediately adjacent to the highway, consisting of one acre, is zoned for multiple family residential…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Wolfskill v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bradbeer v. EnglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Nishkian v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Flagstad v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Iscoff v. POLICE COMMISSION OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.