Legal Opinion
Bradbeer v. England
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1951No. Civ. 18456PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The Hollywood Turf Club, herein referred to as Turf Club, as owner of 124 acres within the city of Inglewood filed with the city’s planning commission, herein designated commission, an application for zone variance with respect to a portion of its property from R-l, one-family zone, to R-3, multiple-family zone, by virtue of provisions of section 14 of ordinance 925 as amended by ordinance 947. Its application was duly denied by the commission which found the prerequisites of section 14 to be not supported, and that the granting of such variance would be materially detrimental to the public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cantrell v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Otis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Broadway Laguna, Vallejo Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Flagstad v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Steiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.