Legal Opinion
Nishkian v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1951No. Civ. 17861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J.—
Martin Nishkian owned real property in the city of Long Beach. He desired to move a former army barracks from Costa Mesa and put it upon his Long Beach lots.
A city ordinance of the city of Long Beach provides that one desiring to move structures along the streets of the city must apply for a permit to do so; that the city building inspector must then post notices on the property to which it is proposed to move the house or building; and that persons owning property within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed new location may protest to the city council; whereupon the city council…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rible v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- California Federation of Teachers v. Oxnard Elementary SchoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- ABS INSTITUTE v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.