Legal Opinion
Fang v. Showa Entetsu Co., Ltd.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 2003No. 02CA0836PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge DAVIDSON.
Defendants, Showa Entetsu Co., Ltd., and SPF Corporation of America, appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to plaintiff, Michael S. Fang. We affirm and remand for an award of appellate attorney fees.
This action arose out of plaintiffs termination of employment with defendants. In 1991, plaintiff and the executive vice president of Showa entered into a two-page employment agreement. This agreement was for an indefinite period of time, but provided, “This agreement may be terminated by the employer by giving 30 days advance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Hartman v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Wank v. Saint Francis CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Barnes v. Van Schaack MortgageColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Montemayor v. Jacor Communications, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Stevenson v. Branch Banking & Trust Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Lees v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hernandez v. Ray Domenico Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.