Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Van Schaack Mortgage
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1990No. 88CA0404PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Defendant, Van Schaack Mortgage, appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding plaintiff, James N. Barnes, commissions on loans which closed after his termination from employment together with his attorney fees pursuant to § 8-4-114, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B). We reverse.
Barnes was employed by Van Schaack Mortgage as a loan originator. His duties included contacting potential customers, helping them fill out loan applications, and sending completed applications to a loan processor for review. The applications were then forwarded to an underwriting committee for final…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Buckley Bros. Motors, Inc. v. Gran Prix Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Rohr v. Ted Neiters Motor Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Scott Co. of California v. MK-Ferguson Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Anderson v. EbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Carmen NIETO v. CLARK'S MARKET, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Fang v. Showa Entetsu Co., Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.