Legal Opinion
Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 2011No. 10CA1453PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
Plaintiff, David Kisselman, appeals the district court's order, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56(h), that sections 10-38-1115 and -1116, C.R.S.2011, were "inapplicable" in this action against defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company. We reverse and remand with directions.
I. Background and Procedural History
On April 4, 2005, Kisselman was injured in a car accident caused by an underinsured driver. At the time of the accident, Kissel-man was covered by an American Family insurance policy that included uninsured/un-derinsured motorist and umbrella coverage up to $1.1…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- v. GEICO Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Fisher v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Rabin v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Kyle W. Larson Enterprises, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.