Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Freedman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 19, 1979No. 28428PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

The defendant (employer) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff (employee) for past compensation, statutory penalties, and attorney’s fees. We modify the judgment of the district court and affirm that judgment as modified.

The plaintiff worked for the defendant from February of 1968 through August of 1975 as a placement counselor and manager of the defendant’s employment agency. Her compensation consisted of commissions, and her benefits included vacation pay. Upon termination of employment, she sought past commissions and vacation pay due her. She and the defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Ground Water CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. More v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Zambruk v. Perlmutter 3rd Generation Builders, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Buder v. Sartore ex rel. BuderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Farley v. Zapata Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Heller v. First National Bank of Denver, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API