Legal Opinion

In Re Hill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1916No. A-2538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition by W. R. Hill, for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Per curiam

In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, W. R. Hill alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by B. R. Rayburne, sheriff of Garvin county, under a commitment issued out of the District Court of said county on a judgment rendered in said court on a verdict of a jury returned in said court. Which verdict reads as follows:

“We, the jury, drawn, empaneled and sworn in the above entitled cause, do upon our oaths, find from the law and the evidence the defendant W. R. Hill guilty as charged in the information of removing mortgaged property from the county without the written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Ex Parte WoodsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ParnellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Ex Parte NyeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Ex Parte WoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Ex Parte BartonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API