Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wood

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1941No. Nos. A-9933 to A-9938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners in the above-entitled causes filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus in this court on the 16th day of September, 1940, alleging they were unlawfully restrained of their liberty by George Goff, the sheriff of Oklahoma county, Okla. It was alleged in said petitions that defendants were being illegally restrained of their liberty by reason of (a) excessive bail, (b) by reason of the filing of an information against each of said defendants in the district court of Oklahoma county, which said informations were based upon a statute that was unconstitutional, (c) by reason of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Ex Parte KeelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Ex Parte BurroughsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Ex Parte WoodsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Ex Parte KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. In Re Blair's PetitionCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Ex parte McAllisterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API